Polcarbotrans

Overview

  • Sectors Institutional Sales
  • Posted Jobs 0
  • Viewed 8
Bottom Promo

Company Description

Generative Artificial Intelligence

Improvements in transformer-based deep neural networks, particularly large language designs (LLMs), allowed an AI boom of generative AI systems in the early 2020s. These include chatbots such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, and LLaMA; text-to-image expert system image generation systems such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, and DALL-E; and text-to-video AI generators such as Sora. [9] [10] [11] [12] Companies such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Baidu along with many smaller companies have developed generative AI models. [7] [13] [14]

Generative AI has uses across a wide variety of markets, consisting of software development, healthcare, financing, entertainment, client service, [15] sales and marketing, [16] art, writing, [17] fashion, [18] and product design. [19] However, concerns have actually been raised about the prospective misuse of generative AI such as cybercrime, using fake news or deepfakes to deceive or manipulate individuals, and the mass replacement of human jobs. [20] [21] Copyright law issues likewise exist around generative designs that are trained on and replicate copyrighted works of art. [22]

Early history

Since its beginning, researchers in the field have raised philosophical and ethical arguments about the nature of the human mind and the consequences of producing synthetic beings with human-like intelligence; these issues have actually formerly been explored by misconception, fiction and philosophy given that antiquity. [23] The idea of automatic art go back a minimum of to the robot of ancient Greek civilization, where inventors such as Daedalus and Hero of Alexandria were referred to as having actually created machines efficient in writing text, generating noises, and playing music. [24] [25] The tradition of creative automations has grown throughout history, exhibited by Maillardet’s automaton produced in the early 1800s. [26] Markov chains have actually long been utilized to model natural languages given that their advancement by Russian mathematician Andrey Markov in the early 20th century. Markov released his first paper on the topic in 1906, [27] [28] and evaluated the pattern of vowels and consonants in the unique Eugeny Onegin utilizing Markov chains. Once a Markov chain is found out on a text corpus, it can then be used as a probabilistic text generator. [29] [30]

Academic artificial intelligence

The scholastic discipline of expert system was established at a research study workshop held at Dartmouth College in 1956 and has experienced a number of waves of improvement and optimism in the years since. [31] Expert system research started in the 1950s with works like Computing Machinery and Intelligence (1950) and the 1956 Dartmouth Summer Research Project on AI. Since the 1950s, artists and researchers have actually utilized expert system to create creative works. By the early 1970s, Harold Cohen was producing and exhibiting generative AI works created by AARON, the computer system program Cohen developed to create paintings. [32]

The terms generative AI preparation or generative preparation were utilized in the 1980s and 1990s to refer to AI planning systems, particularly computer-aided procedure preparation, used to create series of actions to reach a defined objective. [33] [34] Generative AI planning systems utilized symbolic AI approaches such as state area search and restriction fulfillment and were a “reasonably fully grown” technology by the early 1990s. They were utilized to generate crisis action strategies for military usage, [35] process prepare for manufacturing [33] and choice strategies such as in model autonomous spacecraft. [36]

Generative neural nets (2014-2019)

Since its beginning, the field of device knowing utilized both discriminative designs and generative models, to model and predict data. Beginning in the late 2000s, the emergence of deep learning drove progress and research study in image classification, speech acknowledgment, natural language processing and other jobs. Neural networks in this age were normally trained as discriminative models, due to the trouble of generative modeling. [37]

In 2014, improvements such as the variational autoencoder and generative adversarial network produced the very first useful deep neural networks capable of finding out generative designs, rather than discriminative ones, for intricate data such as images. These deep generative designs were the very first to output not only class labels for images however also whole images.

In 2017, the Transformer network allowed improvements in generative designs compared to older Long-Short Term Memory designs, [38] leading to the very first generative pre-trained transformer (GPT), understood as GPT-1, in 2018. [39] This was followed in 2019 by GPT-2 which demonstrated the capability to generalize unsupervised to several tasks as a Structure design. [40]

The new generative designs introduced during this duration permitted for big neural networks to be trained using without supervision knowing or semi-supervised knowing, instead of the monitored learning typical of discriminative models. Unsupervised learning removed the need for human beings to manually label data, permitting bigger networks to be trained. [41]

Generative AI boom (2020-)

In March 2020, 15. ai, created by an anonymous MIT researcher, was a free web application that might generate persuading character voices utilizing minimal training information. [42] The platform is credited as the first mainstream service to popularize AI voice cloning (audio deepfakes) in memes and content production, affecting subsequent advancements in voice AI technology. [43] [44]

In 2021, the introduction of DALL-E, a transformer-based pixel generative model, marked an advance in AI-generated images. [45] This was followed by the releases of Midjourney and Stable Diffusion in 2022, which further democratized access to premium expert system art development from natural language triggers. [46] These systems showed unprecedented capabilities in creating photorealistic images, artwork, and designs based on text descriptions, leading to extensive adoption among artists, designers, and the basic public.

In late 2022, the public release of ChatGPT transformed the ease of access and application of generative AI for general-purpose text-based tasks. [47] The system’s ability to take part in natural discussions, create imaginative material, help with coding, and perform various analytical tasks recorded international attention and sparked prevalent discussion about AI’s prospective impact on work, education, and imagination. [48]

In March 2023, GPT-4’s release represented another jump in generative AI capabilities. A group from Microsoft Research controversially argued that it “could reasonably be seen as an early (yet still incomplete) version of a synthetic general intelligence (AGI) system.” [49] However, this evaluation was objected to by other scholars who maintained that generative AI stayed “still far from reaching the benchmark of ‘general human intelligence'” since 2023. [50] Later in 2023, Meta launched ImageBind, an AI model combining several techniques including text, images, video, thermal information, 3D information, audio, and motion, leading the way for more immersive generative AI applications. [51]

In December 2023, Google revealed Gemini, a multimodal AI design offered in 4 variations: Ultra, Pro, Flash, and Nano. [52] The company integrated Gemini Pro into its Bard chatbot and revealed strategies for “Bard Advanced” powered by the bigger Gemini Ultra design. [53] In February 2024, Google combined Bard and Duet AI under the Gemini brand, releasing a on Android and incorporating the service into the Google app on iOS. [54]

In March 2024, Anthropic released the Claude 3 family of big language models, including Claude 3 Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus. [55] The models showed considerable improvements in abilities throughout various standards, with Claude 3 Opus notably outshining leading designs from OpenAI and Google. [56] In June 2024, Anthropic released Claude 3.5 Sonnet, which showed enhanced performance compared to the larger Claude 3 Opus, particularly in locations such as coding, multistep workflows, and image analysis. [57]

According to a study by SAS and Coleman Parkes Research, China has actually become a worldwide leader in generative AI adoption, with 83% of Chinese participants utilizing the technology, surpassing both the global average of 54% and the U.S. rate of 65%. This management is further evidenced by China’s copyright developments in the field, with a UN report revealing that Chinese entities filed over 38,000 generative AI patents from 2014 to 2023, significantly exceeding the United States in patent applications. [58]

Modalities

A generative AI system is constructed by using without supervision artificial intelligence (conjuring up for example neural network architectures such as generative adversarial networks (GANs), variation autoencoders (VAEs), transformers, or self-supervised maker finding out trained on a dataset. The capabilities of a generative AI system depend on the modality or kind of the data set utilized. Generative AI can be either unimodal or multimodal; unimodal systems take only one type of input, whereas multimodal systems can take more than one kind of input. [59] For example, one version of OpenAI’s GPT-4 accepts both text and image inputs. [60]

Text

Generative AI systems trained on words or word tokens include GPT-3, GPT-4, GPT-4o, LaMDA, LLaMA, BLOOM, Gemini and others (see List of big language designs). They can natural language processing, machine translation, and natural language generation and can be utilized as structure designs for other tasks. [62] Data sets consist of BookCorpus, Wikipedia, and others (see List of text corpora).

Code

In addition to natural language text, big language designs can be trained on programming language text, enabling them to create source code for new computer programs. [63] Examples consist of OpenAI Codex and the VS Code fork Cursor. [64]

Images

Producing premium visual art is a popular application of generative AI. [65] Generative AI systems trained on sets of images with text captions consist of Imagen, DALL-E, Midjourney, Adobe Firefly, FLUX.1, Stable Diffusion and others (see Expert system art, Generative art, and Synthetic media). They are typically used for text-to-image generation and neural style transfer. [66] Datasets include LAION-5B and others (see List of datasets in computer vision and image processing).

Audio

Generative AI can likewise be trained thoroughly on audio clips to produce natural-sounding speech synthesis and text-to-speech capabilities. An early leader in this field was 15. ai, introduced in March 2020, which showed the ability to clone character voices utilizing just 15 seconds of training information. [67] The website acquired widespread attention for its ability to produce emotionally expressive speech for various imaginary characters, though it was later on taken offline in 2022 due to copyright concerns. [68] [69] [70] Commercial options consequently emerged, including ElevenLabs’ context-aware synthesis tools and Meta Platform’s Voicebox. [71]

Generative AI systems such as MusicLM [72] and MusicGen [73] can likewise be trained on the audio waveforms of taped music along with text annotations, in order to create brand-new musical samples based upon text descriptions such as a calming violin melody backed by a distorted guitar riff.

Music

Audio deepfakes of lyrics have actually been created, like the song Savages, which utilized AI to simulate rapper Jay-Z’s vocals. Music artist’s instrumentals and lyrics are copyrighted but their voices aren’t safeguarded from regenerative AI yet, raising an argument about whether artists should get royalties from audio deepfakes. [74]

Many AI music generators have been produced that can be produced utilizing a text expression, category options, and looped libraries of bars and riffs. [75]

Video

Generative AI trained on annotated video can create temporally-coherent, in-depth and photorealistic video clips. Examples consist of Sora by OpenAI, [12] Gen-1 and Gen-2 by Runway, [76] and Make-A-Video by Meta Platforms. [77]

Actions

Generative AI can likewise be trained on the movements of a robotic system to produce new trajectories for movement preparation or navigation. For instance, UniPi from Google Research uses triggers like “pick up blue bowl” or “wipe plate with yellow sponge” to manage movements of a robotic arm. [78] Multimodal “vision-language-action” designs such as Google’s RT-2 can carry out fundamental reasoning in response to user prompts and visual input, such as getting a toy dinosaur when provided the timely choice up the extinct animal at a table filled with toy animals and other objects. [79]

3D modeling

Artificially smart computer-aided style (CAD) can utilize text-to-3D, image-to-3D, and video-to-3D to automate 3D modeling. [80] AI-based CAD libraries could likewise be established utilizing linked open information of schematics and diagrams. [81] AI CAD assistants are utilized as tools to help enhance workflow. [82]

Software and hardware

Generative AI models are used to power chatbot products such as ChatGPT, programming tools such as GitHub Copilot, [83] text-to-image items such as Midjourney, and text-to-video products such as Runway Gen-2. [84] Generative AI functions have actually been integrated into a range of existing commercially offered items such as Microsoft Office (Microsoft Copilot), [85] Google Photos, [86] and the Adobe Suite (Adobe Firefly). [87] Many generative AI models are also available as open-source software, including Stable Diffusion and the LLaMA [88] language design.

Smaller generative AI designs with approximately a couple of billion criteria can work on smartphones, embedded devices, and computers. For example, LLaMA-7B (a version with 7 billion specifications) can run on a Raspberry Pi 4 [89] and one version of Stable Diffusion can operate on an iPhone 11. [90]

Larger designs with tens of billions of parameters can work on laptop computer or desktop computers. To achieve an acceptable speed, designs of this size may require accelerators such as the GPU chips produced by NVIDIA and AMD or the Neural Engine consisted of in Apple silicon items. For instance, the 65 billion specification version of LLaMA can be set up to run on a desktop PC. [91]

The benefits of running generative AI in your area consist of protection of privacy and copyright, and avoidance of rate limiting and censorship. The subreddit r/LocalLLaMA in specific concentrates on utilizing consumer-grade gaming graphics cards [92] through such techniques as compression. That forum is among only 2 sources Andrej Karpathy trusts for language design criteria. [93] Yann LeCun has promoted open-source models for their worth to vertical applications [94] and for enhancing AI security. [95]

Language designs with hundreds of billions of criteria, such as GPT-4 or PaLM, typically operate on datacenter computers geared up with varieties of GPUs (such as NVIDIA’s H100) or AI accelerator chips (such as Google’s TPU). These huge designs are typically accessed as cloud services over the Internet.

In 2022, the United States New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductors to China enforced restrictions on exports to China of GPU and AI accelerator chips utilized for generative AI. [96] Chips such as the NVIDIA A800 [97] and the Biren Technology BR104 [98] were established to meet the requirements of the sanctions.

There is complimentary software application on the market capable of recognizing text created by generative artificial intelligence (such as GPTZero), in addition to images, audio or video originating from it. [99] Potential mitigation strategies for detecting generative AI material include digital watermarking, material authentication, information retrieval, and artificial intelligence classifier models. [100] Despite claims of accuracy, both totally free and paid AI text detectors have regularly produced false positives, incorrectly implicating trainees of sending AI-generated work. [101] [102]

Law and policy

In the United States, a group of business consisting of OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta signed a voluntary contract with the Biden administration in July 2023 to watermark AI-generated material. [103] In October 2023, Executive Order 14110 used the Defense Production Act to need all US companies to report details to the federal government when training particular high-impact AI models. [104] [105]

In the European Union, the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act consists of requirements to reveal copyrighted product utilized to train generative AI systems, and to label any AI-generated output as such. [106] [107]

In China, the Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services presented by the Cyberspace Administration of China manages any public-facing generative AI. It consists of requirements to watermark created images or videos, regulations on training data and label quality, limitations on individual data collection, and a standard that generative AI must “adhere to socialist core worths”. [108] [109]

Copyright

Training with copyrighted content

Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and Midjourney are trained on big, publicly readily available datasets that consist of copyrighted works. AI designers have actually argued that such training is protected under fair use, while copyright holders have argued that it infringes their rights. [110]

Proponents of fair usage training have actually argued that it is a transformative use and does not involve making copies of copyrighted works readily available to the general public. [110] Critics have argued that image generators such as Midjourney can create nearly-identical copies of some copyrighted images, [111] which generative AI programs take on the material they are trained on. [112]

As of 2024, a number of suits connected to the usage of copyrighted product in training are ongoing. Getty Images has actually sued Stability AI over the use of its images to train Stable diffusion. [113] Both the Authors Guild and The New York Times have actually sued Microsoft and OpenAI over making use of their works to train ChatGPT. [114] [115]

Copyright of AI-generated content

A separate question is whether AI-generated works can get approved for copyright protection. The United States Copyright Office has actually ruled that works developed by expert system without any human input can not be copyrighted, since they do not have human authorship. [116] However, the office has likewise started taking public input to figure out if these guidelines need to be fine-tuned for generative AI. [117]

Concerns

The development of generative AI has actually raised concerns from governments, organizations, and people, leading to protests, legal actions, contacts us to stop briefly AI experiments, and actions by numerous governments. In a July 2023 briefing of the United Nations Security Council, Secretary-General António Guterres mentioned “Generative AI has massive potential for great and evil at scale”, that AI may “turbocharge worldwide advancement” and contribute in between $10 and $15 trillion to the worldwide economy by 2030, but that its destructive use “could cause horrific levels of death and destruction, extensive trauma, and deep mental damage on an unimaginable scale”. [118]

Job losses

From the early days of the advancement of AI, there have been arguments put forward by ELIZA developer Joseph Weizenbaum and others about whether tasks that can be done by computers really should be done by them, given the difference in between computer systems and humans, and between quantitative estimations and qualitative, value-based judgements. [120] In April 2023, it was reported that image generation AI has actually resulted in 70% of the tasks for computer game illustrators in China being lost. [121] [122] In July 2023, advancements in generative AI added to the 2023 Hollywood labor conflicts. Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild, declared that “expert system postures an existential danger to creative occupations” during the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike. [123] Voice generation AI has been seen as a potential obstacle to the voice acting sector. [124] [125]

The intersection of AI and work issues among underrepresented groups globally remains an important facet. While AI promises efficiency improvements and ability acquisition, issues about task displacement and biased recruiting procedures continue among these groups, as detailed in surveys by Fast Company. To leverage AI for a more equitable society, proactive actions include mitigating predispositions, promoting openness, appreciating privacy and consent, and embracing diverse teams and ethical factors to consider. Strategies include redirecting policy emphasis on guideline, inclusive style, and education’s capacity for tailored mentor to make the most of advantages while decreasing damages. [126]

Racial and gender bias

Generative AI designs can show and magnify any cultural predisposition present in the underlying data. For instance, a language design may assume that medical professionals and judges are male, and that secretaries or nurses are female, if those biases prevail in the training data. [127] Similarly, an image model triggered with the text “an image of a CEO” might disproportionately create images of white male CEOs, [128] if trained on a racially biased information set. A variety of techniques for mitigating bias have been tried, such as altering input prompts [129] and reweighting training information. [130]

Deepfakes

Deepfakes (a portmanteau of “deep knowing” and “fake” [131] are AI-generated media that take an individual in an existing image or video and replace them with somebody else’s similarity using artificial neural networks. [132] Deepfakes have gathered extensive attention and concerns for their usages in deepfake star adult videos, revenge porn, fake news, hoaxes, health disinformation, financial scams, and concealed foreign election disturbance. [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] This has generated responses from both market and federal government to discover and restrict their usage. [140] [141]

In July 2023, the fact-checking company Logically found that the popular generative AI designs Midjourney, DALL-E 2 and Stable Diffusion would produce plausible disinformation images when triggered to do so, such as images of electoral scams in the United States and Muslim females supporting India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party. [142] [143]

In April 2024, a paper proposed to utilize blockchain (dispersed ledger innovation) to promote “openness, verifiability, and decentralization in AI advancement and usage”. [144]

Audio deepfakes

Instances of users abusing software to produce questionable statements in the vocal design of celebrities, public authorities, and other popular individuals have actually raised ethical concerns over voice generation AI. [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150] In action, companies such as ElevenLabs have actually stated that they would work on mitigating prospective abuse through safeguards and identity confirmation. [151]

Concerns and fandoms have actually spawned from AI-generated music. The same software used to clone voices has actually been used on famous musicians’ voices to develop songs that imitate their voices, gaining both remarkable popularity and criticism. [152] [153] [154] Similar techniques have actually likewise been used to create enhanced quality or full-length variations of tunes that have been dripped or have yet to be launched. [155]

Generative AI has also been utilized to develop brand-new digital artist characters, with some of these receiving sufficient attention to get record offers at significant labels. [156] The developers of these virtual artists have actually also faced their reasonable share of criticism for their personified programs, consisting of backlash for “dehumanizing” an artform, and also developing artists which develop unrealistic or immoral interest their audiences. [157]

Cybercrime

Generative AI’s capability to develop practical phony material has actually been made use of in numerous kinds of cybercrime, including phishing frauds. [158] Deepfake video and audio have been used to produce disinformation and fraud. In 2020, former Google click fraud czar Shuman Ghosemajumder argued that once deepfake videos become completely realistic, they would stop appearing exceptional to viewers, potentially leading to uncritical approval of incorrect information. [159] Additionally, big language models and other forms of text-generation AI have actually been utilized to produce phony evaluations of e-commerce websites to increase scores. [160] Cybercriminals have actually created big language designs concentrated on fraud, including WormGPT and FraudGPT. [161]

A 2023 research study showed that generative AI can be susceptible to jailbreaks, reverse psychology and prompt injection attacks, enabling opponents to acquire help with damaging requests, such as for crafting social engineering and phishing attacks. [162] Additionally, other researchers have actually shown that open-source models can be fine-tuned to eliminate their safety limitations at low cost. [163]

Reliance on market giants

Training frontier AI designs requires an enormous amount of calculating power. Usually only Big Tech companies have the funds to make such investments. Smaller start-ups such as Cohere and OpenAI end up purchasing access to information centers from Google and Microsoft respectively. [164]

Energy and environment

Scientists and reporters have revealed issues about the ecological impact that the development and deployment of generative models are having: high CO2 emissions, [165] [166] [167] big quantities of freshwater used for information centers, [168] [169] and high amounts of electrical power usage. [170] [166] [171] There is likewise issue that these impacts might increase as these designs are incorporated into widely utilized online search engine such as Google Search and Bing; [170] as chatbots and other applications end up being more popular; [170] [169] and as models need to be re-trained. [170]

Proposed mitigation strategies include factoring potential ecological expenses prior to model development or information collection, [165] increasing performance of information centers to reduce electricity/energy usage, [168] [170] [166] [169] [171] [167] constructing more effective maker learning designs, [168] [166] [169] lessening the variety of times that designs need to be re-trained, [167] establishing a government-directed framework for auditing the ecological impact of these designs, [168] [167] managing for transparency of these models, [167] managing their energy and water use, [168] motivating researchers to publish information on their designs’ carbon footprint, [170] [167] and increasing the variety of subject specialists who comprehend both artificial intelligence and climate science. [167]

Content quality

The New york city Times specifies slop as comparable to spam: “substandard or unwanted A.I. content in social media, art, books and … in search engine result.” [172] Journalists have actually revealed issues about the scale of low-quality generated material with regard to social networks material moderation, [173] the financial incentives from social media business to spread such content, [173] [174] incorrect political messaging, [174] spamming of scientific research study paper submissions, [175] increased effort and time to find higher quality or desired content on the Internet, [176] the indexing of produced content by online search engine, [177] and on journalism itself. [178]

A paper released by scientists at Amazon Web Services AI Labs found that over 57% of sentences from a sample of over 6 billion sentences from Common Crawl, a photo of web pages, were maker translated. Much of these automated translations were viewed as lower quality, especially for sentences that were equated across at least three languages. Many lower-resource languages (ex. Wolof, Xhosa) were translated across more languages than higher-resource languages (ex. English, French). [179] [180]

In September 2024, Robyn Speer, the author of wordfreq, an open source database that calculated word frequencies based on text from the Internet, revealed that she had stopped updating the data for several factors: high costs for obtaining data from Reddit and Twitter, excessive concentrate on generative AI compared to other methods in the natural language processing community, and that “generative AI has contaminated the data”. [181]

The adoption of generative AI tools caused a surge of AI-generated material across numerous domains. A study from University College London estimated that in 2023, more than 60,000 academic articles-over 1% of all publications-were most likely written with LLM help. [182] According to Stanford University’s Institute for Human-Centered AI, roughly 17.5% of newly released computer system science documents and 16.9% of peer review text now include content generated by LLMs. [183]

Visual content follows a comparable trend. Since the launch of DALL-E 2 in 2022, it is approximated that an average of 34 million images have been created daily. Since August 2023, more than 15 billion images had been created using text-to-image algorithms, with 80% of these created by designs based upon Stable Diffusion. [184]

If AI-generated content is consisted of in brand-new information crawls from the Internet for extra training of AI models, defects in the resulting models may happen. [185] Training an AI design exclusively on the output of another AI design produces a lower-quality design. Repeating this procedure, where each brand-new design is trained on the previous design’s output, results in progressive destruction and ultimately results in a “model collapse” after numerous versions. [186] Tests have actually been carried out with pattern recognition of handwritten letters and with photos of human faces. [187] As a consequence, the worth of information gathered from authentic human interactions with systems may become progressively important in the presence of LLM-generated content in information crawled from the Internet.

On the other side, artificial data is frequently used as an alternative to data produced by real-world occasions. Such data can be deployed to confirm mathematical designs and to train artificial intelligence models while preserving user privacy, [188] consisting of for structured data. [189] The approach is not restricted to text generation; image generation has actually been utilized to train computer vision models. [190]

Misuse in journalism

In January 2023, Futurism.com broke the story that CNET had been using a concealed internal AI tool to write a minimum of 77 of its stories; after the news broke, CNET published corrections to 41 of the stories. [191]

In April 2023, the German tabloid Die Aktuelle published a fake AI-generated interview with former racing driver Michael Schumacher, who had not made any public looks considering that 2013 after sustaining a brain injury in a snowboarding accident. The story consisted of two possible disclosures: the cover included the line “deceptively real”, and the interview included an acknowledgment at the end that it was AI-generated. The editor-in-chief was fired shortly afterwards in the middle of the debate. [192]

Other outlets that have actually released short articles whose content and/or byline have actually been verified or presumed to be developed by generative AI designs – typically with incorrect material, errors, and/or non-disclosure of generative AI usage – consist of:

– NewsBreak [193] [194]- outlets owned by Arena Group Sports Illustrated [195] TheStreet [195] Men’s Journal [196]
The Columbus Dispatch [198] [199] Reviewed [200] USA Today [201]
Gizmodo [205] Jalopnik [205] A.V. Club [205] [206] Quartz [207]
Bankrate [209]
Yoga Journal [201] Backpacker [201] Clean Eating [201]
Miami Herald [201] Sacramento Bee [201] Tacoma News Tribune [201] The Rock Hill Herald [201] The Modesto Bee [201] Fort Worth Star-Telegram [201] Merced Sun-Star [201] Ledger-Enquirer [201] The Kansas City Star [201] Raleigh News & Observer [217]
PC Magazine [201] Mashable [201] AskMen [201]
Good Housekeeping [201]
People [201] Parents [201] Food & Wine [201] InStyle [201] Real Simple [201] Travel + Leisure [201] Better Homes & Gardens [201] Southern Living [201]
LA Weekly [218] The Village Voice [218]

In May 2024, Futurism noted that a content management system video by AdVon Commerce, who had actually used generative AI to produce articles for many of the abovementioned outlets, appeared to show that they “had produced tens of countless posts for more than 150 publishers.” [201]

News broadcasters in Kuwait, Greece, South Korea, India, China and Taiwan have actually presented news with anchors based upon Generative AI designs, prompting concerns about job losses for human anchors and audience rely on news that has actually traditionally been influenced by parasocial relationships with broadcasters, material creators or social media influencers. [220] [221] [222] Algorithmically generated anchors have actually likewise been utilized by allies of ISIS for their broadcasts. [223]

In 2023, Google apparently pitched a tool to news outlets that declared to “produce news stories” based on input data provided, such as “details of existing events”. Some news company executives who viewed the pitch explained it as” [taking] for granted the effort that entered into producing accurate and artistic news stories.” [224]

In February 2024, Google released a program to pay small publishers to write three short articles daily using a beta generative AI design. The program does not require the understanding or consent of the sites that the publishers are utilizing as sources, nor does it need the published posts to be labeled as being produced or helped by these models. [225]

Many defunct news sites (The Hairpin, The Frisky, Apple Daily, Ashland Daily Tidings, Clayton County Register, Southwest Journal) and blogs (The Unofficial Apple Weblog, iLounge) have gone through cybersquatting, with posts created by generative AI. [226] [227] [228] [229] [230] [231] [232] [233]

United States Senators Richard Blumenthal and Amy Klobuchar have expressed issue that generative AI could have a harmful effect on regional news. [234] In July 2023, OpenAI partnered with the American Journalism Project to money regional news outlets for explore generative AI, with Axios noting the possibility of generative AI companies producing a dependency for these news outlets. [235]

Meta AI, a chatbot based upon Llama 3 which summarizes news stories, was noted by The Washington Post to copy sentences from those stories without direct attribution and to possibly additional decrease the traffic of online news outlets. [236]

In response to potential risks around the use and abuse of generative AI in journalism and fret about decreasing audience trust, outlets around the world, consisting of publications such as Wired, Associated Press, The Quint, Rappler or The Guardian have actually released guidelines around how they prepare to use and not utilize AI and generative AI in their work. [237] [238] [239] [240]

In June 2024, Reuters Institute released their Digital New Report for 2024. In a study of people in America and Europe, Reuters Institute reports that 52% and 47% respectively are uneasy with news produced by “primarily AI with some human oversight”, and 23% and 15% respectively report being comfortable. 42% of Americans and 33% of Europeans reported that they were comfortable with news produced by “primarily human with some assistance from AI”. The results of international surveys reported that people were more unpleasant with news topics consisting of politics (46%), criminal offense (43%), and regional news (37%) produced by AI than other news topics. [241]

Computer programs portal

Technology portal

Artificial general intelligence – Type of AI with extensive capabilities
Artificial imagination – Artificial simulation of human imagination
Artificial intelligence art – Visual media created with AI
Artificial life – Discipline
Chatbot – Program that mimics conversation
Computational creativity – Multidisciplinary endeavour
Generative adversarial network – Deep learning method
Generative pre-trained transformer – Type of large language design
Large language model – Kind of artificial intelligence design
Music and synthetic intelligence – Usage of expert system to produce music
Generative AI porn – Explicit product produced by generative AI
Procedural generation – Method in which data is produced algorithmically as opposed to by hand
Retrieval-augmented generation – Type of details retrieval utilizing LLMs
Stochastic parrot – Term used in maker learning

References

^ Newsom, Gavin; Weber, Shirley N. (September 5, 2023). “Executive Order N-12-23” (PDF). Executive Department, State of California. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 21, 2024. Retrieved September 7, 2023.
^ Pinaya, Walter H. L.; Graham, Mark S.; Kerfoot, Eric; Tudosiu, Petru-Daniel; Dafflon, Jessica; Fernandez, Virginia; Sanchez, Pedro; Wolleb, Julia; da Costa, Pedro F.; Patel, Ashay (2023 ). “Generative AI for Medical Imaging: extending the MONAI Framework”. arXiv:2307.15208 [eess.IV]
^ “What is ChatGPT, DALL-E, and generative AI?”. McKinsey. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
^ “What is generative AI?”. IBM. March 22, 2024.
^ Pasick, Adam (March 27, 2023). “Artificial Intelligence Glossary: Neural Networks and Other Terms Explained”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on September 1, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2023.
^ Karpathy, Andrej; Abbeel, Pieter; Brockman, Greg; Chen, Peter; Cheung, Vicki; Duan, Yan; Goodfellow, Ian; Kingma, Durk; Ho, Jonathan; Rein Houthooft; Tim Salimans; John Schulman; Ilya Sutskever; Wojciech Zaremba (June 16, 2016). “Generative designs”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ a b Griffith, Erin; Metz, Cade (January 27, 2023). “Anthropic Said to Be Closing In on $300 Million in New A.I. Funding”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on December 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Lanxon, Nate; Bass, Dina; Davalos, Jackie (March 10, 2023). “A Cheat Sheet to AI Buzzwords and Their Meanings”. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (March 14, 2023). “OpenAI Plans to Up the Ante in Tech’s A.I. Race”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on March 31, 2023. Retrieved March 31, 2023.
^ Thoppilan, Romal; De Freitas, Daniel; Hall, Jamie; Shazeer, Noam; Kulshreshtha, Apoorv (January 20, 2022). “LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications”. arXiv:2201.08239 [cs.CL]
^ Roose, Kevin (October 21, 2022). “A Coming-Out Party for Generative A.I., Silicon Valley’s New Craze”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 15, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ a b Metz, Cade (February 15, 2024). “OpenAI Unveils A.I. That Instantly Generates Eye-Popping Videos”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February 15, 2024. Retrieved February 16, 2024.
^ “The race of the AI laboratories heats up”. The Economist. January 30, 2023. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Yang, June; Gokturk, Burak (March 14, 2023). “Google Cloud brings generative AI to designers, companies, and federal governments”. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Li, Danielle; Raymond, Lindsey R. (April 2023), Generative AI at Work (Working Paper), Working Paper Series, doi:10.3386/ w31161, archived from the initial on March 28, 2024, obtained January 21, 2024
^ “Don’t fear an AI-induced jobs apocalypse simply yet”. The Economist. March 6, 2023. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ Coyle, Jake (September 27, 2023). “In Hollywood authors’ battle versus AI, human beings win (for now)”. AP News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on April 3, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Harreis, H.; Koullias, T.; Roberts, Roger. “Generative AI: Unlocking the future of fashion”. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
^ “How Generative AI Can Augment Human Creativity”. Harvard Business Review. June 16, 2023. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the original on June 20, 2023. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
^ Hendrix, Justin (May 16, 2023). “Transcript: Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on Oversight of AI”. techpolicy.press. Archived from the initial on November 17, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Simon, Felix M.; Altay, Sacha; Mercier, Hugo (October 18, 2023). “Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown”. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. doi:10.37016/ mr-2020-127. S2CID 264113883. Archived from the original on November 17, 2023. Retrieved November 16, 2023.
^ “New AI systems hit copyright law”. BBC News. August 1, 2023. Retrieved September 28, 2024.
^ Newquist, H. P. (1994 ). The Brain Makers: Genius, Ego, And Greed In The Quest For Machines That Think. New York City: Macmillan/SAMS. pp. 45-53. ISBN 978-0-672-30412-5.
^ Sharkey, Noel (July 4, 2007), A programmable robot from 60 AD, vol. 2611, New Scientist, archived from the initial on January 13, 2018, retrieved October 22, 2019
^ Brett, Gerard (July 1954), “The Automata in the Byzantine “Throne of Solomon””, Speculum, 29 (3 ): 477-487, doi:10.2307/ 2846790, ISSN 0038-7134, JSTOR 2846790, S2CID 163031682.
^ kelinich (March 8, 2014). “Maillardet’s Automaton”. The Franklin Institute. Archived from the original on August 24, 2023. Retrieved August 24, 2023.
^ Grinstead, Charles Miller; Snell, James Laurie (1997 ). Introduction to Probability. American Mathematical Society. pp. 464-466. ISBN 978-0-8218-0749-1.
^ Bremaud, Pierre (March 9, 2013). Markov Chains: Gibbs Fields, Monte Carlo Simulation, and Queues. Springer Science & Business Media. p. ix. ISBN 978-1-4757-3124-8. Archived from the original on March 23, 2017.
^ Hayes, Brian (2013 ). “First Links in the Markov Chain”. American Scientist. 101 (2 ): 92. doi:10.1511/ 2013.101.92. ISSN 0003-0996. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
^ Fine, Shai; Singer, Yoram; Tishby, Naftali (July 1, 1998). “The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications”. Artificial intelligence. 32 (1 ): 41-62. doi:10.1023/ A:1007469218079. ISSN 1573-0565. S2CID 3465810.
^ Crevier, Daniel (1993 ). AI: The Tumultuous Search for Artificial Intelligence. New York, New York City: BasicBooks. p. 109. ISBN 0-465-02997-3.
^ Bergen, Nathan; Huang, Angela (2023 ). “A Brief History of Generative AI” (PDF). Dichotomies: Generative AI: Navigating Towards a Better Future (2 ): 4. Archived (PDF) from the initial on August 10, 2023. Retrieved August 8, 2023.
^ a b Alting, Leo; Zhang, Hongchao (1989 ). “Computer aided procedure preparation: the modern study”. The International Journal of Production Research. 27 (4 ): 553-585. doi:10.1080/ 00207548908942569. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024. Retrieved October 3, 2023.
^ Chien, Steve (1998 ). “Automated preparation and scheduling for goal-based autonomous spacecraft”. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications. 13 (5 ): 50-55. doi:10.1109/ 5254.722362.
^ Burstein, Mark H., ed. (1994 ). ARPA/Rome Laboratory Knowledge-based Planning and Scheduling Initiative Workshop Proceedings. The Advanced Research Projects Agency, Department of Defense, and Rome Laboratory, US Air Force, Griffiss AFB. p. 219. ISBN 155860345X.
^ Pell, Barney; Bernard, Douglas E.; Chien, Steve A.; Gat, Erann; Muscettola, Nicola; Nayak, P. Pandurang; Wagner, Michael D.; Williams, Brian C. (1998 ). Bekey, George A. (ed.). An Autonomous Spacecraft Agent Prototype. Autonomous Robots Volume 5, No. 1. pp. 29-45. Our deliberator is a standard generative AI planner based on the HSTS planning structure (Muscettola, 1994), and our control component is a traditional spacecraft attitude control system (Hackney et al. 1993). We also add an architectural part clearly devoted to world modeling (the mode identifier), and compare control and tracking.
^ Jebara, Tony (2012 ). Artificial intelligence: discriminative and generative. Vol. 755. Springer Science & Business Media.
^ Cao, Yihan; Li, Siyu; Liu, Yixin; Yan, Zhiling; Dai, Yutong; Yu, Philip S.; Sun, Lichao (March 7, 2023). “An Extensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT”. arXiv:2303.04226 [cs.AI]
^ “finetune-transformer-lm”. GitHub. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2023. Retrieved May 19, 2023.
^ Radford, Alec; Wu, Jeffrey; Child, Rewon; Luan, David; Amodei, Dario; Sutskever, Ilya (2019 ). “Language models are unsupervised multitask students” (PDF). OpenAI Blog.
^ Radford, Alec (June 11, 2018). “Improving language comprehending with not being watched knowing”. OpenAI. Retrieved October 6, 2024.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Artificial intelligence”. Towards Data Science. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator reveals journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the original on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Anirudh VK (March 18, 2023). “Deepfakes Are Elevating Meme Culture, But At What Cost?”. Analytics India Magazine. Archived from the initial on December 26, 2024. Retrieved December 18, 2024. While AI voice memes have been around in some type because ’15. ai’ introduced in 2020, […] ^ Coldewey, Devin (January 5, 2021). “OpenAI’s DALL-E produces possible pictures of actually anything you ask it to”. TechCrunch. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ “Stable Diffusion Public Release”. Stability AI. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Lock, Samantha (December 5, 2022). “What is AI chatbot phenomenon ChatGPT and could it change human beings?”. The Guardian. Retrieved March 15, 2023.
^ Huang, Haomiao (August 23, 2023). “How ChatGPT turned generative AI into an “anything tool””. Ars Technica. Retrieved September 21, 2024.
^ Bubeck, Sébastien; Chandrasekaran, Varun; Eldan, Ronen; Gehrke, Johannes; Horvitz, Eric; Kamar, Ece; Lee, Peter; Lee, Yin Tat; Li, Yuanzhi; Lundberg, Scott; Nori, Harsha; Palangi, Hamid; Ribeiro, Marco Tulio; Zhang, Yi (March 22, 2023). “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early try outs GPT-4”. arXiv:2303.12712 [cs.CL]
^ Schlagwein, Daniel; Willcocks, Leslie (September 13, 2023). “ChatGPT et al: The Ethics of Using (Generative) Expert System in Research and Science”. Journal of Information Technology. 38 (2 ): 232-238. doi:10.1177/ 02683962231200411. S2CID 261753752.
^ “Meta open-sources multisensory AI model that combines 6 types of information”. May 9, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2024.
^ Kruppa, Miles (December 6, 2023). “Google Announces AI System Gemini After Turmoil at Rival OpenAI”. The Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Edwards, Benj (December 6, 2023). “Google releases Gemini-a powerful AI model it states can exceed GPT-4”. Ars Technica. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Metz, Cade (February 8, 2024). “Google Releases Gemini, an A.I.-Driven Chatbot and Voice Assistant”. The New York Times. Retrieved February 8, 2024.
^ “Introducing the next generation of Claude”. Retrieved March 4, 2024.
^ Nuñez, Michael (March 4, 2024). “Anthropic unveils Claude 3, surpassing GPT-4 and Gemini Ultra in benchmark tests”. Venture Beat. Retrieved April 9, 2024.
^ Pierce, David (June 20, 2024). “Anthropic has a quick new AI design – and a creative brand-new way to engage with chatbots”. The Verge. Retrieved June 22, 2024.
^ Baptista, Eduardo (July 9, 2024). “China leads the world in adoption of generative AI, study programs”. Reuters. Retrieved July 14, 2024.
^ “A History of Generative AI: From GAN to GPT-4”. March 21, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 10, 2023. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
^ “Explainer: What is Generative AI, the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT?”. Reuters. March 17, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 30, 2023. Retrieved March 17, 2023.
^ Roose, Kevin (February 16, 2023). “Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Be Alive.'”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 15, 2023. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D. A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; von Arx, S.; Bernstein, M. S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A; Brunskill, E.; Brynjolfsson, E. (August 16, 2021). “On the chances and threats of structure designs”. arXiv:2108.07258 [cs.LG]
^ Chen, Ming; Tworek, Jakub; Jun, Hongyu; Yuan, Qinyuan; Pinto, Hanyu Philippe De Oliveira; Kaplan, Jerry; Edwards, Haley; Burda, Yannick; Joseph, Nicholas; Brockman, Greg; Ray, Alvin (July 6, 2021). “Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code”. arXiv:2107.03374 [cs.LG]
^ “Buying Cursor”. Andreesen Horowitz.
^ Epstein, Ziv; Hertzmann, Aaron; Akten, Memo; Farid, Hany; Fjeld, Jessica; Frank, Morgan R. ; Groh, Matthew; Herman, Laura; Leach, Neil; Mahari, Robert; Pentland, Alex “Sandy”; Russakovsky, Olga; Schroeder, Hope; Smith, Amy (2023 ). “Art and the science of generative AI”. Science. 380 (6650 ): 1110-1111. arXiv:2306.04141. Bibcode:2023 Sci … 380.1110 E. doi:10.1126/ science.adh4451. PMID 37319193. S2CID 259095707.
^ Ramesh, Aditya; Pavlov, Mikhail; Goh, Gabriel; Gray, Scott; Voss, Chelsea; Radford, Alec; Chen, Mark; Sutskever, Ilya (2021 ). “Zero-shot text-to-image generation”. International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR. pp. 8821-8831.
^ Chandraseta, Rionaldi (January 21, 2021). “Generate Your Favourite Characters’ Voice Lines using Machine Learning”. Towards Data Science. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Temitope, Yusuf (December 10, 2024). “15. ai Creator exposes journey from MIT Project to internet phenomenon”. The Guardian. Archived from the initial on December 28, 2024. Retrieved December 25, 2024.
^ Ruppert, Liana (January 18, 2021). “Make Portal’s GLaDOS And Other Beloved Characters Say The Weirdest Things With This App”. Game Informer. Archived from the initial on January 18, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024.
^ Kurosawa, Yuki (January 19, 2021). “ゲームキャラ音声読み上げソフト 15. ai 公開中 。 Undertale や Portal のキャラに好きなセリフを言ってもらえる” [Game Character Voice Reading Software “15. ai” Now Available. Get Characters from Undertale and Portal to Say Your Desired Lines] AUTOMATON (in Japanese). Archived from the initial on January 19, 2021. Retrieved December 18, 2024. 英語版ボイスのみなので注意 。; もうひとつ15.aiの大きな特徴として挙げられるのが 、 豊かな感情表現だ 。 [Please note that just English voices are available.; Another major feature of 15. ai is its abundant emotional expression.] ^ Desai, Saahil (July 17, 2023). “A Voicebot Just Left Me Speechless”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on December 8, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Agostinelli, Andrea; Denk, Timo I.; Borsos, Zalán; Engel, Jesse; Verzetti, Mauro; Caillon, Antoine; Huang, Qingqing; Jansen, Aren; Roberts, Adam; Tagliasacchi, Marco; Sharifi, Matt; Zeghidour, Neil; Frank, Christian (January 26, 2023). “MusicLM: Generating Music From Text”. arXiv:2301.11325 [cs.SD]
^ Dalugdug, Mandy (August 3, 2023). “Meta in June said that it utilized 20,000 hours of certified music to train MusicGen, which consisted of 10,000 “premium” licensed music tracks. At the time, Meta’s scientists described in a paper the ethical obstacles that they experienced around the advancement of generative AI models like MusicGen”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023.
^ “Jay-Z’s Delaware manufacturer stimulates dispute over AI rights”. Archived from the initial on February 27, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ “10 “Best” AI Music Generators (April 2024) – Unite.AI”. October 19, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 29, 2024. Retrieved February 27, 2024.
^ Metz, Cade (April 4, 2023). “Instant Videos Could Represent the Next Leap in A.I. Technology”. The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 5, 2023.
^ Wong, Queenie (September 29, 2022). “Facebook Parent Meta’s AI Tool Can Create Artsy Videos From Text”. cnet.com. Archived from the initial on April 5, 2023. Retrieved April 4, 2023.
^ Yang, Sherry; Du, Yilun (April 12, 2023). “UniPi: Learning universal policies via text-guided video generation”. Google Research, Brain Team. Google AI Blog. Archived from the original on May 24, 2023.
^ Brohan, Anthony (2023 ). “RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control”. arXiv:2307.15818 [cs.RO]
^ Abdullahi, Aminu (November 17, 2023). “10 Best Artificial Intelligence (AI) 3D Generators”. eWEEK. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “Slash CAD design develop times with brand-new AI-driven part creation method|GlobalSpec”. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ “The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the CAD Industry”. March 22, 2023. Archived from the initial on February 9, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Sabin, Sam (June 30, 2023). “GitHub has a vision to make code more protected by design”. Axios Codebook. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (March 20, 2023). “Text-to-video AI inches closer as start-up Runway announces new design”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on September 27, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Text-to-video is the next frontier for generative AI, though present output is fundamental. Runway states it’ll be making its brand-new generative video design, Gen-2, available to users in ‘the coming weeks.’
^ Vanian, Jonathan (March 16, 2023). “Microsoft includes OpenAI innovation to Word and Excel”. CNBC. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Microsoft is bringing generative expert system innovations such as the popular ChatGPT talking app to its Microsoft 365 suite of company software application … the brand-new A.I. features, dubbed Copilot, will be offered in some of the business’s most popular business apps, consisting of Word, PowerPoint and Excel.
^ Wilson, Mark (August 15, 2023). “The app’s Memories feature simply got a big upgrade”. TechRadar. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. The Google Photos app is getting a revamped, AI-powered Memories function … you’ll have the ability to use generative AI to come up with some suggested names like “a desert experience”.
^ Sullivan, Laurie (May 23, 2023). “Adobe Adds Generative AI To Photoshop”. MediaPost. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Generative expert system (AI) will become one of the most essential functions for innovative designers and online marketers. Adobe on Tuesday revealed a Generative Fill feature in Photoshop to bring Firefly’s AI capabilities into design.
^ Michael Nuñez (July 19, 2023). “LLaMA 2: How to access and use Meta’s flexible open-source chatbot right now”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on November 3, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. If you wish to run LLaMA 2 by yourself machine or modify the code, you can download it straight from Hugging Face, a leading platform for sharing AI models.
^ Pounder, Les (March 25, 2023). “How To Create Your Own AI Chatbot Server With Raspberry Pi 4”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Using a Pi 4 with 8GB of RAM, you can create a ChatGPT-like server based on LLaMA.
^ Kemper, Jonathan (November 10, 2022). “”Draw Things” App brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone”. The Decoder. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. Draw Things is an app that brings Stable Diffusion to the iPhone. The AI images are generated in your area, so you don’t need an Internet connection.
^ Witt, Allan (July 7, 2023). “Best Computer to Run LLaMA AI Model at Home (GPU, CPU, RAM, SSD)”. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023. To run LLaMA design at home, you will require a computer system develop with an effective GPU that can handle the big amount of data and calculation required for inferencing.
^ Westover, Brian (September 28, 2023). “Who Needs ChatGPT? How to Run Your Own Free and Private AI Chatbot”. Ziff Davis. Archived from the initial on January 7, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2024.
^ @karpathy (December 20, 2023). “I basically only trust two LLM evals right now” (Tweet) – through Twitter.
^ @ylecun (January 5, 2024). “Nabla’s shift from ChatGPT to open source LLMs …” (Tweet) – via Twitter.
^ @ylecun (November 1, 2023). “Open source platforms * increase * security and security” (Tweet) – by means of Twitter.
^ Nellis, Stephen; Lee, Jane (September 1, 2022). “U.S. officials order Nvidia to halt sales of leading AI chips to China”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ Shilov, Anton (May 7, 2023). “Nvidia’s Chinese A800 GPU’s Performance Revealed”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on May 7, 2024. Retrieved August 15, 2023. the A800 runs at 70% of the speed of A100 GPUs while abiding by strict U.S. export requirements that restrict just how much processing power Nvidia can offer.
^ Patel, Dylan (October 24, 2022). “How China’s Biren Is Attempting To Evade US Sanctions”. Archived from the original on August 15, 2023. Retrieved August 15, 2023.
^ “5 free software to identify phony AI-generated images” (in Italian). October 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved October 29, 2023.
^ “Detecting AI fingerprints: A guide to watermarking and beyond”. Brookings Institution. January 4, 2024. Archived from the original on September 3, 2024. Retrieved September 5, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (April 3, 2023). “We tested a new ChatGPT-detector for teachers. It flagged an innocent trainee”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on March 28, 2024. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Fowler, Geoffrey (June 2, 2023). “Detecting AI may be impossible. That’s a huge problem for instructors”. washingtonpost.com. Archived from the initial on June 3, 2023. Retrieved February 6, 2024.
^ Bartz, Diane; Hu, Krystal (July 21, 2023). “OpenAI, Google, others promise to watermark AI content for security, White House says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on July 27, 2023.
^ “FACT SHEET: President Biden Issues Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence”. The White House. October 30, 2023. Archived from the initial on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Burt, Andrew (October 31, 2023). “3 Obstacles to Regulating Generative AI”. Harvard Business Review. ISSN 0017-8012. Archived from the initial on February 17, 2024. Retrieved February 17, 2024.
^ “EU AI Act: first guideline on expert system”. European Parliament. August 6, 2023. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
^ Chee, Foo Yun; Mukherjee, Supantha (June 14, 2023). “EU legislators elect harder AI guidelines as draft relocate to last stage”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 26, 2023.
^ Ye, Josh (July 13, 2023). “China states generative AI guidelines to use only to products for the public”. Reuters. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 13, 2023.
^ “生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法”. July 13, 2023. Archived from the original on July 27, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ a b “Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law”. Congressional Research Service. LSB10922. September 29, 2023. Archived from the initial on March 22, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Thompson, Stuart (January 25, 2024). “We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image”. The New York City Times. Archived from the initial on January 25, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Hadero, Haleluya; Bauder, David (December 27, 2023). “The New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for using its stories to train chatbots”. Associated Press News. AP News. Archived from the initial on December 27, 2023. Retrieved April 13, 2023.
^ O’Brien, Matt (September 25, 2023). “Photo giant Getty took a leading AI image-maker to court. Now it’s likewise embracing the innovation”. AP NEWS. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 30, 2024. Retrieved January 30, 2024.
^ Barber, Gregory (December 9, 2023). “The Generative AI Copyright Fight Is Just Beginning”. Wired. Archived from the initial on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Bruell, Alexandra (December 27, 2023). “New York Times Sues Microsoft and OpenAI, Alleging Copyright Infringement”. Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on January 18, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ Brittain, Blake (August 21, 2023). “AI-generated art can not receive copyrights, US court says”. Reuters. Archived from the initial on January 20, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ David, Emilla (August 29, 2023). “US Copyright Office wishes to hear what people think of AI and copyright”. The Verge. Archived from the original on January 19, 2024. Retrieved January 19, 2024.
^ “Secretary-General’s remarks to the Security Council on Expert System”. un.org. July 18, 2023. Archived from the original on July 28, 2023. Retrieved July 27, 2023.
^ “The Writers Strike Is Deciding on AI”. Time. May 4, 2023. Archived from the original on June 11, 2023. Retrieved June 11, 2023.
^ Tarnoff, Ben (August 4, 2023). “Lessons from Eliza”. The Guardian Weekly. pp. 34-39.
^ Zhou, Viola (April 11, 2023). “AI is already taking video game illustrators’ tasks in China”. Rest of World. Archived from the original on August 13, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Carter, Justin (April 11, 2023). “China’s game art market supposedly decimated by growing AI use”. Game Developer. Archived from the initial on August 17, 2023. Retrieved August 17, 2023.
^ Collier, Kevin (July 14, 2023). “Actors vs. AI: Strike brings focus to emerging usage of advanced tech”. NBC News. Archived from the initial on July 20, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023. SAG-AFTRA has actually joined the Writer’s [sic] Guild of America in demanding a contract that clearly demands AI guidelines to secure authors and the works they create. … The future of generative artificial intelligence in Hollywood-and how it can be utilized to change labor-has end up being an important sticking point for stars going on strike. In a news conference Thursday, Fran Drescher, president of the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (more typically referred to as SAG-AFTRA), declared that ‘expert system poses an existential risk to creative occupations, and all stars and entertainers should have contract language that secures them from having their identity and talent made use of without consent and pay.’
^ Wiggers, Kyle (August 22, 2023). “ElevenLabs’ voice-generating tools release out of beta”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on November 28, 2023. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
^ Shrivastava, Rashi. “‘Keep Your Paws Off My Voice’: Voice Actors Worry Generative AI Will Steal Their Livelihoods”. Forbes. Archived from the original on December 2, 2023. Retrieved November 28, 2023.
^ Gupta, Shalene (October 31, 2023). “Underrepresented groups in countries around the world are stressed over AI being a risk to tasks”. Fast Company. Archived from the original on December 8, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.
^ Rachel Gordon (March 3, 2023). “Large language models are biased. Can logic assist in saving them?”. MIT CSAIL. Archived from the original on January 23, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ OpenAI (July 18, 2022). “Reducing predisposition and improving security in DALL · E 2”. OpenAI. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Jake Traylor (July 27, 2022). “No quick fix: How OpenAI’s DALL · E 2 highlighted the challenges of bias in AI”. NBC News. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ “DALL · E 2 pre-training mitigations”. OpenAI. June 28, 2022. Archived from the initial on January 26, 2024. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
^ Brandon, John (February 16, 2018). “Terrifying state-of-the-art porn: Creepy ‘deepfake’ videos are on the rise”. Fox News. Archived from the initial on June 15, 2018. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ Cole, Samantha (January 24, 2018). “We Are Truly Fucked: Everyone Is Making AI-Generated Fake Porn Now”. Vice. Archived from the original on September 7, 2019. Retrieved May 4, 2019.
^ “What Are Deepfakes & Why the Future of Porn is Terrifying”. Highsnobiety. February 20, 2018. Archived from the initial on July 14, 2021. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
^ “Experts fear face switching tech could start an international face-off”. The Outline. Archived from the original on January 16, 2020. Retrieved February 28, 2018.
^ Roose, Kevin (March 4, 2018). “Here Come the Fake Videos, Too”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 24, 2018.
^ Schreyer, Marco; Sattarov, Timur; Reimer, Bernd; Borth, Damian (2019 ). “Adversarial Learning of Deepfakes in Accounting”. arXiv:1910.03810 [cs.LG]
^ Menz, Bradley (2024 ). “Health Disinformation Use Case Highlighting the Urgent Need for Artificial Intelligence Vigilance”. JAMA Internal Medicine. 184 (1 ): 92-96. doi:10.1001/ jamainternmed.2023.5947. PMID 37955873. S2CID 265148637. Archived from the initial on February 4, 2024. Retrieved February 4, 2024.
^ Chalfant, Morgan (March 6, 2024). “U.S. braces for foreign disturbance in 2024 election”. Semafor. Archived from the original on March 11, 2024. Retrieved March 6, 2024.
^ Menn, Joseph (September 23, 2024). “Russia, Iran utilize AI to enhance anti-U.S. impact projects, authorities say”. The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on September 24, 2024. Retrieved September 23, 2024.
^ “Join the Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC)”. deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai. Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved November 8, 2019.
^ Clarke, Yvette D. (June 28, 2019). “H.R. 3230 – 116th Congress (2019-2020): Defending Each and Every Person from False Appearances by Keeping Exploitation Subject to Accountability Act of 2019”. www.congress.gov. Archived from the initial on December 17, 2019. Retrieved October 16, 2019.
^ “New Research Reveals Scale of Threat Posed by AI-generated Images on 2024 Elections”. Logically. July 27, 2023. Archived from the original on October 3, 2023. Retrieved July 6, 2024.
^ Lawton, Graham (September 12, 2023). “Disinformation wars: The fight versus fake news in the age of AI”. New Scientist. Retrieved July 5, 2024.
^ Brewer, Jordan; Patel, Dhru; Kim, Dennie; Murray, Alex (April 12, 2024). “Navigating the challenges of generative technologies: Proposing the combination of synthetic intelligence and blockchain”. Business Horizons. 67 (5 ): 525-535. doi:10.1016/ j.bushor.2024.04.011. ISSN 0007-6813.
^ “People Are Still Terrible: AI Voice-Cloning Tool Misused for Deepfake Celeb Clips”. PCMag Middle East. January 31, 2023. Archived from the original on December 25, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “The generative A.I. software application race has begun”. Fortune. Archived from the original on March 25, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Milmo, Dan; Hern, Alex (May 20, 2023). “Elections in UK and US at risk from AI-driven disinformation, say specialists”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 16, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “Seeing is thinking? Global scramble to deal with deepfakes”. news.yahoo.com. Archived from the initial on February 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Vincent, James (January 31, 2023). “4chan users welcome AI voice clone tool to generate celeb hatespeech”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on December 3, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Thompson, Stuart A. (March 12, 2023). “Making Deepfakes Gets Cheaper and Easier Thanks to A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on October 29, 2023. Retrieved July 25, 2023.
^ “A brand-new AI voice tool is already being abused to make deepfake celebrity audio clips”. Engadget. January 31, 2023. Archived from the initial on October 10, 2023. Retrieved February 3, 2023.
^ Gee, Andre (April 20, 2023). “Even If AI-Generated Rap Songs Go Viral Doesn’t Mean They’re Good”. Wanderer. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 19, 2023). “An A.I. Hit of Fake ‘Drake’ and ‘The Weeknd’ Rattles the Music World”. The New York City Times. Archived from the original on May 15, 2023. Retrieved December 5, 2023.
^ Lippiello, Emily; Smith, Nathan; Pereira, Ivan (November 3, 2023). “AI songs that simulate popular artists raising alarms in the music industry”. ABC News. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Skelton, Eric. “Fans Are Using Artificial Intelligence to Turn Rap Snippets Into Full Songs”. Complex. Archived from the original on January 2, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Marr, Bernard. “Virtual Influencer Noonoouri Lands Record Deal: Is She The Future Of Music?”. Forbes. Archived from the initial on December 4, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Thaler, Shannon (September 8, 2023). “Warner Music signs first-ever record handle AI pop star”. New York City Post. Archived from the initial on December 15, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ Sjouwerman, Stu (December 26, 2022). “Deepfakes: Prepare for phishing 2.0”. Fast Company. Archived from the initial on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Sonnemaker, Tyler. “As social networks platforms brace for the inbound wave of deepfakes, Google’s previous ‘scams czar’ predicts the biggest threat is that deepfakes will ultimately become boring”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Collinson, Patrick (July 15, 2023). “Fake reviews: can we trust what we read online as usage of AI blows up?”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on November 22, 2023. Retrieved December 6, 2023.
^ “After WormGPT, FraudGPT Emerges to Help Scammers Steal Your Data”. PCMAG. July 25, 2023. Archived from the original on July 31, 2023. Retrieved July 31, 2023.
^ Gupta, Maanak; Akiri, Charankumar; Aryal, Kshitiz; Parker, Eli; Praharaj, Lopamudra (2023 ). “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy”. IEEE Access. 11: 80218-80245. arXiv:2307.00691. Bibcode:2023 IEEEA..1180218 G. doi:10.1109/ ACCESS.2023.3300381. S2CID 259316122.
^ Piper, Kelsey (February 2, 2024). “Should we make our most effective AI designs open source to all?”. Vox. Retrieved January 13, 2025.
^ Metz, Cade (July 10, 2023). “In the Age of A.I., Tech’s Little Guys Need Big Friends”. New York Times.
^ a b Bender, Emily M.; Gebru, Timnit; McMillan-Major, Angelina; Shmitchell, Shmargaret (March 1, 2021). “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models be Too Big?”. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. FAccT ’21. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 610-623. doi:10.1145/ 3442188.3445922. ISBN 978-1-4503-8309-7.
^ a b c d “AI is an energy hog. This is what it means for environment change”. MIT Technology Review. May 23, 2024. Archived from the original on August 20, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f g Dhar, Payal (August 1, 2020). “The carbon effect of expert system”. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2 (8 ): 423-425. doi:10.1038/ s42256-020-0219-9. ISSN 2522-5839. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024.
^ a b c d e Crawford, Kate (February 20, 2024). “Generative AI’s ecological costs are skyrocketing – and mostly secret”. Nature. 626 (8000 ): 693. Bibcode:2024 Natur.626..693 C. doi:10.1038/ d41586-024-00478-x. PMID 38378831. Archived from the original on August 22, 2024.
^ a b c d Rogers, Reece. “AI’s Energy Demands Are Out of Control. Welcome to the Internet’s Hyper-Consumption Era”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on August 14, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b c d e f Saenko, Kate (May 23, 2023). “Is generative AI bad for the environment? A computer system researcher describes the carbon footprint of ChatGPT and its cousins”. The Conversation. Archived from the initial on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Lohr, Steve (August 26, 2024). “Will A.I. Ruin the Planet or Save the Planet?”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hoffman, Benjamin (June 11, 2024). “First Came ‘Spam.’ Now, With A.I., We have actually Got ‘Slop'”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b “Investigation Finds Actual Source of All That AI Slop on Facebook”. Futurism. August 10, 2024. Archived from the original on August 15, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ a b Warzel, Charlie (August 21, 2024). “The MAGA Aesthetic Is AI Slop”. The Atlantic. Archived from the initial on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Edwards, Benj (August 14, 2024). “Research AI model suddenly attempts to customize its own code to extend runtime”. Ars Technica. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hern, Alex; Milmo, Dan (May 19, 2024). “Spam, scrap … slop? The most recent wave of AI behind the ‘zombie web'”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on August 26, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Cox, Joseph (January 18, 2024). “Google News Is Boosting Garbage AI-Generated Articles”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on June 13, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Beloved Local Newspapers Fired Staffers, Then Started Running AI Slop”. Futurism. July 31, 2024. Archived from the original on August 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Thompson, Brian; Dhaliwal, Mehak; Frisch, Peter; Domhan, Tobias; Federico, Marcello (August 2024). Ku, Lun-Wei; Martins, Andre; Srikumar, Vivek (eds.). “A Stunning Amount of the Web is Machine Translated: Insights from Multi-Way Parallelism”. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024. Bangkok, Thailand and virtual conference: Association for Computational Linguistics: 1763-1775. arXiv:2401.05749. doi:10.18653/ v1/2024. findings-acl.103.
^ Roscoe, Jules (January 17, 2024). “A ‘Shocking’ Amount of the Web Is Already AI-Translated Trash, Scientists Determine”. VICE. Archived from the original on July 1, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (September 19, 2024). “Project Analyzing Human Language Usage Shuts Down Because ‘Generative AI Has Polluted the Data'”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on September 19, 2024. Retrieved September 20, 2024. While there has constantly been spam on the web and in the datasets that Wordfreq utilized, “it was workable and frequently identifiable. Large language designs create text that masquerades as real language with intent behind it, although there is none, and their output crops up everywhere,” she composed. She gives the example that ChatGPT overuses the word “dig,” in a method that individuals do not, which has actually thrown off the frequency of this particular word.
^ Gray, Andrew (March 24, 2024). “ChatGPT “contamination”: estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature”. arXiv:2403.16887 [cs.DL]
^ Kannan, Prabha (May 13, 2024). “Just How Much Research Is Being Written by Large Language Models?”. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Stanford University. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Valyaeva, Alina (August 15, 2023). “AI Image Statistics for 2024: How Much Content Was Created by AI”. Everypixel Journal. Retrieved August 16, 2024.
^ Shumailov, Ilia; Shumaylov, Zakhar; Zhao, Yiren; Papernot, Nicolas; Anderson, Ross; Gal, Yarin (July 2024). “AI designs collapse when trained on recursively produced information”. Nature. 631 (8022 ): 755-759. Bibcode:2024 Natur.631..755 S. doi:10.1038/ s41586-024-07566-y. PMC 11269175. PMID 39048682.
^ Bhatia, Aatish (August 26, 2024). “When A.I.’s Output Is a Hazard to A.I. Itself”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Self-Consuming Generative Models Go Mad”. ICLR. 2024.
^ Owen, Sean (April 12, 2023). “Synthetic Data for Better Machine Learning”. databricks.com. Archived from the original on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Sharma, Himanshu (July 11, 2023). “Synthetic Data Platforms: Unlocking the Power of Generative AI for Structured Data”. kdnuggets.com. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
^ Stöckl, Andreas (November 2, 2022). “Evaluating an Artificial Image Dataset Generated with Stable Diffusion”. arXiv:2211.01777 [cs.CV]
^ Roth, Emma (January 25, 2023). “CNET discovered errors in over half of its AI-written stories”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on November 6, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ “A publication touted Michael Schumacher’s first interview in years. It was really AI”. NPR. April 28, 2023. Archived from the initial on June 17, 2023. Retrieved June 17, 2023.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor (January 3, 2024). “Police Say AI-Generated Article About Local Murder Is “Entirely” Comprised”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 5, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “NewsBreak: Most downloaded US news app has Chinese roots and ‘writes fiction’ using AI”. Reuters. June 5, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ a b Harrison, Maggie (November 27, 2023). “Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 15, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 9, 2023). “Magazine Publishes Serious Errors in First AI-Generated Health Article”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Schneider, Jaron (December 14, 2023). “B&H Photo Published an AI-Generated Guide Written by a Fake Person”. PetaPixel. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Harrison, Maggie (August 29, 2023). “USA Today Owner Pauses AI Articles After Butchering Sports Coverage”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Buchanan, Tyler (August 28, 2023). “Dispatch pauses AI sports writing program”. Axios. Archived from the initial on January 1, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Sommer, Will (October 26, 2023). “Mysterious bylines appeared on an U.S.A. Today site. Did these writers exist?”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on October 26, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac “Meet AdVon, the AI-Powered Content Monster Infecting the Media Industry”. Futurism. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 4, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ O’Sullivan, Donie; Gordon, Allison (November 2, 2023). “How Microsoft’s AI is making a mess of the news|CNN Business”. CNN. Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Meade, Amanda (July 31, 2023). “News Corp utilizing AI to produce 3,000 Australian local newspaper article a week”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Tangermann, Victor (June 30, 2023). “Gizmodo Staff Furious After Site Announces Move to AI Content”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ a b c Kafka, Peter (July 18, 2023). “Pertaining to your web, whether you like it or not: More AI-generated stories”. Vox. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Landymore, Frank; Christian, Jon (September 13, 2023). “The A.V. Club’s AI-Generated Articles Are Copying Directly From IMDb”. Futurism. Archived from the original on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Stiaplame, Nordiisk (January 28, 2025). “Quartz Is Publishing AI-Generated Articles Based on Other AI Slop, Together With Warning They May Be Filled With Errors”. Futurism. Archived from the original on January 29, 2025. Retrieved January 30, 2025.
^ Carroll, Rory (May 14, 2023). “Irish Times apologises for scam AI short article about ladies’s use of phony tan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on May 14, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Christian, Jon (February 1, 2023). “CNET Sister Site Restarts AI Articles, Immediately Publishes Idiotic Error”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on November 27, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Al-Sibai, Noor; Christian, Jon (March 30, 2023). “BuzzFeed Is Quietly Publishing Entire AI-Generated Articles”. Futurism. Archived from the initial on December 6, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ “Newsweek is making generative AI a fixture in its newsroom”. Nieman Lab. April 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 15, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “What’s in a byline? For Hoodline’s AI-generated local news, whatever – and absolutely nothing”. Nieman Lab. June 3, 2024. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “AI-generated news is here from S.F.-based Hoodline. What does that mean for conventional publishers?”. San Francisco Chronicle. May 8, 2024. Archived from the original on June 5, 2024. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
^ Gold, Hadas (May 30, 2024). “A national network of local news sites is releasing AI-written posts under fake bylines. Experts are raising alarm”. CNN. Archived from the initial on June 6, 2024. Retrieved June 8, 2024.
^ “Wyoming press reporter caught using expert system to produce fake quotes and stories”. Associated Press. August 14, 2024. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Cosmos Magazine releases AI-generated articles, drawing criticism from reporters, co-founders”. ABC News. August 7, 2024. Archived from the initial on August 24, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI-generated short articles are permeating major news publications”. National Public Radio. May 16, 2024. Archived from the original on June 19, 2024. Retrieved July 8, 2024.
^ a b c Knibbs, Kate (July 30, 2024). “Zombie Alt-Weeklies Are Stuffed With AI Slop About OnlyFans”. Wired. Archived from the original on August 11, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “Apple says it will upgrade AI function after incorrect news signals”. The Guardian. January 7, 2025. Archived from the initial on January 14, 2025. Retrieved January 14, 2025.
^ “TV channels are utilizing AI-generated presenters to check out the news. The concern is, will we trust them?”. BBC News. January 26, 2024. Archived from the original on January 26, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Tait, Amelia (October 20, 2023). “‘Here is the news. You can’t stop us’: AI anchor Zae-In grants us an interview”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 28, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kuo, Lily (November 9, 2018). “World’s first AI news anchor unveiled in China”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on February 20, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “These ISIS news anchors are AI fakes. Their propaganda is real”. Washington Post. May 17, 2024. Archived from the initial on May 19, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Mullin, Benjamin; Grant, Nico (July 20, 2023). “Google Tests A.I. Tool That Is Able to Write News Articles”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the initial on May 16, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Stenberg, Mark (February 27, 2024). “Google Is Paying Publishers Five-Figure Sums to Test an Unreleased Gen AI Platform”. Adweek. Archived from the initial on March 9, 2024. Retrieved April 17, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 7, 2024). “Confessions of an AI Clickbait Kingpin”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the original on May 18, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (January 26, 2024). “How Beloved Indie Blog ‘The Hairpin’ Developed Into an AI Clickbait Farm”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on April 14, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason (July 9, 2024). “A Cherished Tech Blog Is Now Publishing AI Articles Under the Names of Its Old Human Staff”. 404 Media. Archived from the original on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ Hollister, Sean (July 10, 2024). “Early Apple tech bloggers are stunned to discover their name and work have been AI-zombified”. The Verge. Archived from the initial on July 12, 2024. Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ “AI slop is already invading Oregon’s local journalism”. Oregon Public Broadcasting. December 9, 2024. Archived from the original on December 9, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Knibbs, Kate (February 26, 2024). “How a Little Iowa Newspaper’s Website Became an AI-Generated Clickbait Factory”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Archived from the initial on February 26, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Koebler, Jason; Cole, Samantha; Maiberg, Emanuel; Cox, Joseph (January 26, 2024). “We Need Your Email Address”. 404 Media. Archived from the initial on December 2, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ “Meet the Serbian Businessman/DJ Who Runs the Zombie AI Southwest Journal – Racket”. Racket. February 16, 2024. Archived from the original on November 13, 2024. Retrieved December 10, 2024.
^ Lima-Strong, Cristiano (January 11, 2024). “Senators caution AI might lead to ‘damage’ of regional news”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on January 11, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “OpenAI strikes $5 million-plus regional news deal”. Axios. July 18, 2023. Archived from the initial on July 19, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ Kelly, Heather (May 22, 2024). “Meta strolled away from news. Now the company’s utilizing it for AI content”. Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the initial on May 22, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
^ “How WIRED Will Use Generative AI Tools”. Wired. Archived from the initial on December 30, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Barrett, Amanda (November 15, 2018). “Standards around generative AI“. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 23, 2023. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Viner, Katharine; Bateson, Anna (June 16, 2023). “The Guardian’s method to generative AI”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the initial on January 3, 2024. Retrieved January 8, 2024.
^ Becker, K. B.; Simon, F. M.; Crum, C. (2023 ). “Policies in parallel? A comparative research study of journalistic AI policies in 52 international news organisations”. pp. 8-9. doi:10.31235/ osf.io/ c4af9.
^ Newman, Nic; Fletcher, Richard; Robertson, Craig T.; Arguedas, Amy Ross; Nielsen, Rasmus Fleis (June 2024). “Digital Report 2024” (PDF). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

Bottom Promo
Bottom Promo
Top Promo